Skip to main content

CDP Sprint 1 (2026-Q3) — Jira reconciliation, pass 3 (2026-07-09)

Jira reconciliation — recheck (2026-07-09, pass 3)​

Third pass the same day, run via the deterministic sprint:reconcile engine (previously hand-eyeballed passes). Sprint 21382 still holds 50 issues — no board composition change since pass 2. This pass also creates cdp/delivery/roster.json (mirroring bifrost's), which materially sharpens the engine's staffing findings below versus a first dry run without it (see finding 10).

Status of the 2026-07-09 (pass 2) findings — all re-verified against a fresh pull, none resolved:

  1. coverage-gap (sprint-scope drift) — STILL OPEN: TF-3399/3400/3401, TF-3312–3316, TF-3271/3272/3273/3279, TF-3464–3472, TF-3426/3427/3428 all still absent from sprint 21382.
  2. roster-mismatch (Azani zero board presence) — STILL OPEN: no Azani-assigned issues in sprint 21382 or project-wide.
  3. off-plan-load (TF-3477 "26Q3 CDP Adhoc") — STILL OPEN: same 5 tasks (TF-3478, TF-3479, TF-3483, TF-3484, TF-3486) still in-sprint, still undocumented in the repo, Zhelia Alifa still off-roster.
  4. Data-quality (TF-3459 duplicate of TF-3464) — STILL OPEN: TF-3459 confirmed Won't Fix/Done, epic-less; TF-3464 confirmed In Progress under Julio Jeffer Maliangkay, still unsprinted.
  5. coverage-gap (Export Customer Data P6 BE) — STILL OPEN: TF-3181 in-sprint still has only FE (Giovanni Massimiliano) and QA (Gregorius Hendry) tickets, zero BE.
  6. coverage-gap (CEBE P8 RFC-authoring task) — STILL OPEN: no TF-3302 issue of any kind in sprint 21382.
  7. status-progress (P3 task-breakdown not mirrored to repo) — STILL OPEN: cdp/team-owner-field-and-team-permission/rfcs/ still holds only the RFC + its review.
  8. status-progress (TF-3464 in-progress but unsprinted) — STILL OPEN, reconfirmed above.
  9. SPRINT_PRIORITY_DRIFT (2026-07-07 P1/P2 relabel) — RESOLVED and holding: no further drift between this sprint doc and the roadmap ## Priority table.

New findings from the 2026-07-09 (pass 3) engine run:

  1. Meta-finding, now fixed in this same pass: cdp/delivery/roster.json did not exist. A dry run of sprint:reconcile without it degraded to name-fuzzy matching and threw 5 false-positive off-plan-load rows for Hendry, Jovi, Berlianto, Alfi, and Ghozi — all five are plainly on this sprint's plan, so the real gap was the missing roster file, not their staffing. Created cdp/delivery/roster.json (mirroring bifrost's shape) with confirmed live displayNames for Ghozi, Berlianto, Julio Jeffer, Jovi, Alfi, and Hendry (from this sprint's digest); Azani's displayName is left null/flagged (zero board presence, nothing to resolve against) and Izzul's is carried over from bifrost's roster as the same shared cross-squad backup QA resource (unconfirmed independently for cdp). accountId is null for all pending a deliberate lookupJiraAccountId resolution — never a live name guess, per the "Satya ≠ Natasha Satya" trap. With the roster in place, sprint:reconcile now reports 7 findings (down from 9 noisy ones): the 3 coverage-gap rows below, 3 precise roster-mismatch rows, and 1 status-progress row.
  2. roster-mismatch (deterministic, engine-computed with the new roster): Julio Jeffer and Azani each have a plan queue but zero issues assigned in the live sprint — Jeffer's known work (Segmentation buffer bugfixing, Legacy Migration Activity Logs BE, CEBE RFC-authoring) exists only as unsprinted/nonexistent tickets per findings 1/6 above, and Azani per finding 2. Izzul also reports zero sprint issues, but this is expected, not a gap — the plan's own Izzul brief says "no active queue this sprint... hold in reserve" (QA backup).
  3. coverage-gap (deterministic, engine-corroborated): TF-2544 (Customer Segmentation), TF-3182 (Legacy Migration: CRM Activity Logs), and TF-3359 (Create Ticket & Auto-Associate) each have exactly 1 issue in sprint 21382 and 0 BE/FE-tagged issues — in each case the sole in-sprint ticket is a [QA] Write Test Cases task (TF-3490, TF-3493, TF-3495 respectively). This is a narrower, epic-level restatement of finding 1's sprint-scope drift, not a new gap — corroborates it independently via the digest rather than the roadmap Priority table.
  4. status-progress (editorial, real and new): every in-sprint Epic carries a paired [QA] Write Test Cases ticket — TF-3490 (Customer Segmentation) is Done; its five siblings (TF-3491 Team Owner, TF-3492 Notes Migration, TF-3493 Activity Logs, TF-3494 Export, TF-3495 Create Ticket) are all still To Do. The Segmentation initiative's dated delivery/status/2026-07-01.md still shows progress_done_days: 0 / progress_pct: 0% as an explicit t0 baseline — legitimate when written, but now stale against Hendry's completed QA test-case slice for that initiative.

This pass does not fix: none of the 9 carried-forward Jira findings (sprint-scope drift, the Azani staffing gap, the TF-3477 adhoc bucket, the TF-3459 duplicate, the two coverage gaps, the missing task-breakdown file, or the unsprinted in-progress ticket) — those still need the PM/TPM/DRI calls and Jira edits from the pass-1 worklist. This pass also does not write a new dated status/ entry for finding 13's progress signal, and does not assign an accountId for any roster.json entry — both stay editorial, DRI-owned edits per CLAUDE.md doctrine.

Downstream propagation worklist (pass 3 additions)​

#FindingCanonical artifact to reconcileOwning tool / skill
9Segmentation QA test-case slice (TF-3490) done, baseline status staleAuthor a new dated cdp/customer-segmentation/delivery/status/2026-07-09.md capturing progress_done_days: 1.5 (Hendry's QA slice) of 8.5 known days (~18%), then cache to README progress_* + roadmap mirrorHand-edit + lint:delivery
10roster.json accountIds unresolved (Ghozi, Berlianto, Julio Jeffer, Jovi, Alfi, Hendry all null)Resolve each via a deliberate lookupJiraAccountId call (never a live name guess) and fill in cdp/delivery/roster.jsonHand-edit, editor-side
11Izzul's zero-queue status is a false roster-mismatch signal (he's intentionally benched)No action — document as an expected exception if sprint:reconcile keeps flagging it every passn/a (informational)

Always run npm run lint:delivery (DOCS_ROOT pointed at this repo) after any propagation edit — already run clean for this pass (0 errors; pre-existing advisory warnings elsewhere are unrelated).